|
|
March 2007
Fast Food: A Pro, or Con?
In General, healthy eating means a balance of major nutrients, increased consumption of specific vitamins or micronutrients, and avoidence of food contaminants. The government should remove some fast food places, like KFC, but shouldn't remove healthy fast food places, like subway. Personally, I like Taco Bell, but the food there is greasy and unhealthy to us. Fast food is usually very unhealthy.
There are many good things about getting rid of fast food restaurants. Without them, the abundant 'fat' people of the world wouldn't have been 'fat'. Without fast food restaurants, instead of getting in the car, polluting the air, and getting food fast, humans might use the most important organ of the body. Using the mind and brain, they might think about right food choices.
Not only are their good reasons for getting rid of fast food, but there are bad consequences too. Some of he economy is made up of the fast food business, and taking the fast food restaurant out of the economy could hurt the economy, and leave many people jobless. If fast food restraunts are banished, the less rich couldn't afford outside dining at regular restaurants, because they usually cost a lot. Many people like the fast food, and would be sad if they can never see it again.
Some fast food restaurants should remain, like I said before, and some should be removed. The fast food restaurants that should be kept, in my perspective, are Subway, Quiznos, and any other originals. The fast food restaurants that should be removed are (and I don't really want to say this) KFC, Taco Bell, Pizza Hut, and a WHOLE bunch more!
Many countries are allowing the fast food chain to populat in their regions. Fast foods is mighty good, but think twice before you eat it, because the results could end up bad!
|
|